3 Comments
User's avatar
Direction Reset Notes's avatar

Reading this from the small-company side: a five-person team doesn't get a

Chief AI Officer. The role compresses into the founder, wanted or not.

And at that scale the pointing can't hide anywhere — it's usually one person

pointing at the tool. Which is why the honest question for a small team

isn't just who owns the output, but who decided the output was worth

shipping in the first place. When the answer is "the model seemed

confident," that's the small-business version of answering "technology."

Josh Rowe's avatar

Agreed. A five-person company isn’t hiring a Chief AI Officer. But if you don’t have legal, tax or cyber expertise in-house, you get help when you need it. Why would AI be any different?

Direction Reset Notes's avatar

Agreed — and legal/tax/cyber is the right analogy for how small teams will

actually cover this: rent the expertise, don't staff it.

The one difference: those needs announce themselves. An audit letter, a

filing deadline, a breach. AI's judgment need is silent — every output

ships with a decision already baked in, and the tool never raises its hand.

So "help when you need it" first requires noticing the when.