Companies expect big returns from AI. Their hiring shows what happens when AI starts doing real work.
Reading this from the small-company side: a five-person team doesn't get a
Chief AI Officer. The role compresses into the founder, wanted or not.
And at that scale the pointing can't hide anywhere — it's usually one person
pointing at the tool. Which is why the honest question for a small team
isn't just who owns the output, but who decided the output was worth
shipping in the first place. When the answer is "the model seemed
confident," that's the small-business version of answering "technology."
Agreed. A five-person company isn’t hiring a Chief AI Officer. But if you don’t have legal, tax or cyber expertise in-house, you get help when you need it. Why would AI be any different?
Reading this from the small-company side: a five-person team doesn't get a
Chief AI Officer. The role compresses into the founder, wanted or not.
And at that scale the pointing can't hide anywhere — it's usually one person
pointing at the tool. Which is why the honest question for a small team
isn't just who owns the output, but who decided the output was worth
shipping in the first place. When the answer is "the model seemed
confident," that's the small-business version of answering "technology."
Agreed. A five-person company isn’t hiring a Chief AI Officer. But if you don’t have legal, tax or cyber expertise in-house, you get help when you need it. Why would AI be any different?